Overall, the
connection I had within all of the articles is that the higher concern was
mental illness. People are more afraid of the mental aspect than the guns. The
article "Please Take Away My Right to a Gun" linked guns and mental
illness in the perspective of someone who is mentally ill. This author’s stance
on guns is that she personally wants her rights taken away, to lessen her
chance of hurting herself. She doesn’t really talk about helping mental illness, but
she says that if she was in the possession of a gun at one of her low points
she doesn’t know if she’d be alive to write this article “If I had purchased
that gun and it had been in my possession, I’m not sure I would have been able
to resist and would be here typing these words.” The article “Please Take Away
My Right to a Gun” connected a lot to the article “Guns and Mental Illness”,
they both talked about the correlation between guns and mental illness and that
they should both be helped evenly. In “Guns and Mental illness”, a quote I was
“If conservatives need to face the need for gun regulations, liberals need to acknowledge
that untreated mental illness is also an important part of the reason mass
killings take place”, which made a good point in showing both sides, and that they need to come
together and compromise. My personal stance on the treatment of mental illness
is that we should take more preventative care and actually force it, even if it
could be considered a “human right” not to. My stance on guns (I hate them), I
think they should be hard to buy from not only mentally ill people but people
in general. I don’t think they are a huge cause to the problem of mass
shootings, but I do think that it’s the weapon that makes the massacres so
deadly. After reading these I have a more open mind to mental illness and not
just the guns because before I was really just an extreme gun hater.
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Thursday, February 6, 2014
Cask of...
One part of the nature of mental illness is that it doesn't like to come out (usually) in public affairs. For example, with all the events reoccuring he didn't strike until they became deeper, and deeper into the cave. It also shows that it isn't also present or predictable, a lot of people have moments leading up to something big, which then shows the true mental illness. It makes assumptions that most killings are outcomes of a person with mental illnesses. It also makes the reader assume that the guy was weird because he kept getting the guy drunk. I think one of the inaccurate ways is that they are all violent, not all those with mental illnesses are violent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)